Attention Economy


Friday, August 28, 2015

Inaccurate, Sensationalist and Misleading Reporting

It is very popular in the Western media these days to exaggerate and sensationalize events in emerging markets. Recent reports in leading US and UK publications claimed that there was around a trillion dollar capital outflow from emerging markets in recent months. In reality, the figures were far smaller.
Here is a reality check from investment firm Ashmore Group (The real EM capital outflow story – and why EM investors need to think for themselves By Jan Dehn and Alexis de Mones)
“Given the scale of the FX valuation effects it is clear that estimates of capital outflows from EM that do not take them into account will be hopelessly wrong. Our estimates of EM capital outflows – after controlling for FX valuations effects – turn out to be between 3 and 5 times smaller than the estimate in the report. At between USD 183bn and USD 295bn, depending on the methodology used, EM capital outflows are still large, but they are by no means catastrophic. They measure between 0.6% and 0.9% of total tradable debt and equity in EM. Alternatively, rather than being more than twice the size of outflows recorded during 2008/2009 – a point laboured by the Financial Times – the outflows are in fact significantly smaller, perhaps as low as half that size. Our estimates of the scale of outflows also have the merit of being far more consistent with the price action. In 2008/2009, sovereign debt spreads in EM blew out to 800bps. Today, spreads are around 400bps. Local bond yields in EM blew out to more than 9.5% in 2008. Today, yields are about 7% and still below levels seen during the Taper Tantrum. Last week the Institute of International Finance (IIF) published an outflow number of just under USD 300bn, based on data for the last four quarters. This estimate is very close to our own. The IIF concluded, “Don’t panic! EM capital flows have weakened, but NOT collapsed”. Ignorance and prejudice about EM are rife. When combined they can become dangerous. When they fuel misleading, sensationalist media headlines they remind us that there is no substitute for independent thinking when it comes to EM.