Attention Economy


Friday, August 31, 2012

US Monetary Stimulus Debate Continues


WSJ has an interesting piece on Prof. Woodford’s influence on US monetary policymaking. Doctoral students specializing in macroeconomics will be familiar with his 2003 tome – “Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy”


Meanwhile, Gerald P. O'Driscoll JR. argues that further monetary stimulus (QE 3) will be largely futile:
“The trouble with all forms of temporary spending is that they have no permanent effects. They delay needed adjustments in the economy.”

Update:

Ben Bernanke's Jackson Hole speech
http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20120831a.pdf


Further Updates:

Two prominent economists provide their viewpoints on timely monetary policy issues -
Martin Feldstein on the Fed and Future Inflation
John Cochrane on the Fed’s Expanding Role

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Updates on US and Global Economic Conditions


Global Economy

Global Economic Conditions – An Update

Policy Response to the Chinese Economic Slowdown

US Economy

The second estimate of 2012 Q2 US real GDP indicates that the economy grew at a 1.7% rate compared to the advance estimate of 1.5%:


There is an ongoing debate regarding the significance of structural factors vis-a-vis cyclical factors in explaining US labor market conditions. Here is a rather interesting Brookings Institution report that highlights the significance of education gap:


Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Current Policy Debates


Systems in Need of Reform:

Patents and Litigation

Sebastian Mallaby has an interesting take on the malfunctioning US Patent system


Media analyst, Michael Wolff, captures the insecurities underlying Apple’s litigiousness:
“This fierce defensiveness might be rightly understood in a psychological sense: Apple itself is based on stolen iconography. There was first the Beatle's Apple and there was Xerox PARC's desktop design. Apple's self-righteousness masks its guilt. (It may be sheepish, too, about being more of a marketing organization than a technology company.) What's more, it knows better than anybody that if you relax your vigilance, somebody can easily walk off with what you've done – and improve it.”

Regarding the dysfunctional patent system, Wolff notes:
“Patents are, arguably, no longer a system of protection; they are a system of litigation. Great numbers of patents are now filed, in an over-burdened system, to protect not innovations but the right to litigate over innovations. Indeed, any patent of value will ultimately be litigated.”



US Corporate Tax System – In Desperate Need of Reform

------

On the Consequences of Fed’s Monetary Policies:


QE 3 Debate

Arguing for a shift to a single mandate for the US central bank, Bob Corker makes an interesting point regarding the Fed in his FT op-ed:
“We need a Federal Reserve that will help, not hinder, our country’s vital transformation to an economy comprised of savers, and not wholly reliant on over-leveraged consumers.”

Meanwhile, Asian policymakers are already worried about the consequences of another (potential) round of QE

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

International Finance and Trade Issues


Economist Fred Bergsten argues that the Euro will survive after all

Meanwhile, Adam Davidson looks at some challenges ahead for the Eurozone

Economist Dean Baker on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement’s hidden agenda

Friday, August 24, 2012

Aug 24 - Friday Highlights

Interesting Links


Paul Volcker and the Great Inflation Episode of the 1970s and Early 1980s (Three-Part Series)


Assessing College Readiness - ACT has some interesting data on the preparedness of high school grads for college work: http://media.act.org/documents/CCCR12-NationalReadinessRpt.pdf
The gist of the ACT report is that not many high school graduates are prepared for college-level courses involving math and science.


Wall Street Gets Its Way Again


Theodore Dalrymple on the Irrelevance of (British) Foreign Aid

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Politics and Economics


U of Chicago’s Casey Mulligan Looks at Deficit Spending:

Larry Kotlikoff on the Politicization of Economics

_____

Neil Barofsky Interview – Interesting Insights Regarding the TARP Bailout

Sunday, August 19, 2012

Jobs, Technological Progress and Government Policy


Robots, Technology & the Future of Jobs

-----

Economists are typically wary of government driven industrial policies aimed at boosting favored sectors. Here is a reason why:

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

The World's Top 500 Universities - 2012 Edition

The Latest Ranking of Top Global Universities:
http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2012.html

On International Economics


Economist Robert Barro Discusses Political Misunderstandings Regarding International Trade & Market Intervention

Gillian Tett’s Excellent Colum in the FT – “Global shift in US business confounds Washington”


Eurozone’s Double Dip Recession


Sunday, August 12, 2012

The Questionable Status of Social Security Trust Funds


On Social Security Trust Funds

An excellent AP piece, via WashPost, highlights several critical aspects regarding the status of the US Social Security system, including the following:

“Here’s how it works: For nearly three decades Social Security produced big surpluses, collecting more in taxes than it paid in benefits. The government, however, spent that money on other programs, reducing the amount it had to borrow from the public, including foreign investors. That’s why some advocates complain that Congress has “raided” Social Security.
In return, the Treasury Department issued special bonds to Social Security. The bonds are now valued at $2.7 trillion. They are accounted for in two Social Security trust funds, one for the retirement program and one for the disability program.”

Monday, August 6, 2012

Debates Regarding Economic Growth, Taxes & Stocks


Bloomberg’s Postrel reflects on McCloskey’s reexamination of what drives economic growth over the very long run:
-----

WSJ’s David Wessel examines the American tax system:
Here are a few key stats from the article –
“In the 1980s, the top 5% averaged 22.6% of income and paid 28.5% of taxes.
In the 1990s, the top 5% averaged 25.3% of income and paid 34.3% of taxes
In the 2000s, the top 5% averaged 28.4% of the income and paid 40.3% of the taxes.”
-----

PIMCO’s Bill Gross vs. Wharton’s Jeremy Siegel on equities:


Friday, August 3, 2012

Excellent Friday Op-eds


NYTIMES columnist, Roger Cohen, makes a great point:
“… But safety should not be paramount; it is not a supreme value; it should not be the altar at which freedom is sacrificed. Just because more and more tools exist to control people does not mean authorities should use them, and just because accidents happen does not mean life should be lived as if they are always imminent.”

David Brooks on life:

WashPost’s Pozen on discount rates and pension accounting: