Attention Economy


Saturday, October 22, 2016

The Minimum Wage Debate: Microeconomics versus Macroeconomics

A great piece - Doomsayers Keep Getting It Wrong on Higher Minimum Wages by Barry Ritholtz:
“Blame a fundamental misunderstanding of minimum-wage economics and, of course, good old-fashioned political bias. There have been repeated attempts to misread the data and conclude it has hurt employment, but so far none of this research has withstood scrutiny….
Why did so many economists get this wrong? They looked at the micro and ignored the macro. In the basic model of supply and demand, an increase in the cost of something reduces demand. This may be true in an isolated laboratory setting. But when minimum wages went up in the real world, it affected not just the parties to that transaction, but the regional economy. By considering only the relationship between employer and employee, the dismal-science set was focusing too narrowly. The critics failed to consider the impact of lower-wage employees earning more money; these folks typically spends almost everything they earn, which means that when they’re paid more it goes right back into the local economy.”

Related:
Does a minimum wage increase lead to a fall in employment?

Survey of Economists – Impact of Minimum Wage Hike