Attention Economy


Wednesday, December 27, 2017

Illusions/Misconceptions regarding Bitcoin's Economic Role

A timely piece from Megan McArdle: Bitcoin Is an Implausible Currency
“I find that a lot of the people who write me about bitcoin talk about it in exactly the same way that gold bugs talked about gold 10 years ago. They are particularly attracted to the fact that its quantity is strictly limited: There can never be more than 21 million bitcoins in existence. If you’re worried that your government is going to inflate away the value of your savings, that guaranteed scarcity is pretty valuable….
Inflation is low. Moreover -- and much more importantly -- most of the people with serious savings no longer do that saving in banks, where their savings is vulnerable to inflation risk. For most Americans, their biggest asset is their home, which is hedged against inflation, which is to say that home prices will rise along with the general price level. The equities in their 401(k)s offer a similar inflation hedge.”

The simple reason Bitcoin will never be a currency by Matt O'Brien
Matt O'Brien notes:
“Just because you call something a currency doesn't mean it is one. It has to be a stable store of value that people actually use to buy things with. Bitcoin fails on both accounts. Indeed, in the past year, the number of bitcoin transactions is up only about 33 percent from what was (and is still) a very low level.”

Related:

Start Worrying When Investors Borrow to Buy Bitcoins
Bloomberg’s Noah Smith notes:
“Why does debt make bubbles so much worse? When equity crashes, notional wealth simply vanishes. That makes people feel poorer, which makes them consume less -- a phenomenon known as the wealth effect. But when companies or households have borrowed a lot of money from each other, an asset price crash can also cause other bad effects. Lenders who see their loans go bad will themselves be forced to borrow money, which slows the real economy because borrowing is costlier than funding a business internally. Debt also creates systemic risk, because key financial institutions can go bankrupt easily if they have too much leverage. Banks whose debts suddenly go bad have trouble lending to businesses due to their own capital adequacy requirements, or even require a government bailout. And households saddled with an overhang of debt may shift into deleveraging mode, hurting consumption -- a phenomenon known as a balance sheet recession.”

Saturday, December 23, 2017

Future of the Retail Sector

Richard Florida considers the future of the retail sector:


Traditional Retailing is Collapsing in America:
The Economist notes:
“Not every mall or shop is dying. For now, store-occupancy rates are healthy. Nor have consumers stopped shopping. But they are spending money in new ways to the benefit of other businesses, such as restaurants, hotels and e-retailers, in particular Amazon. As a result, a giant established industry is descending into crisis.”

US retail industry is going through a massive change:

The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy by NEIL IRWIN

Amazon’s Move Signals End of Line for Many Cashiers by CLAIRE CAIN MILLER


Consumption Habits and Class Distinction

Interesting piece: The New, Subtle Ways the Rich Signal their Wealth
“Eschewing an overt materialism, the rich are investing significantly more in education, retirement and health – all of which are immaterial, yet cost many times more than any handbag a middle-income consumer might buy. The top 1% now devote the greatest share of their expenditures to inconspicuous consumption, with education forming a significant portion of this spend (accounting for almost 6% of top 1% household expenditures, compared with just over 1% of middle-income spending). In fact, top 1% spending on education has increased 3.5 times since 1996, while middle-income spending on education has remained flat over the same time period.”

Friday, December 22, 2017

Thursday, December 21, 2017

Applied Economics: Economics of Healthcare [UPDATED]

Medical Mystery: Something Happened to U.S. Health Spending After 1980
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/14/upshot/medical-mystery-health-spending-1980.html

Economics of Prescription Drug Prices
Is Healthcare a Right? By Dr. Atul Gawande

Wednesday, December 20, 2017

Tax Cuts and Fiscal Policy

The Economist on the GOP Tax Bill:

Greg Ip of WSJ - GOP Tax Bill Fixes Some Problems, But Exacerbates Others

Robert Samuelson on the projected US budget deficits:
“To be fair, Republicans argue that their tax cuts will pay for themselves by speeding up the economy and generating a gusher of new tax revenue — a claim doubted by many economists. If Republicans had the courage of their convictions, they would have advanced a stand-alone corporate tax reduction (touted as the biggest contributor to growth) financed entirely by ending other tax breaks.
As it is, the Republicans send exactly the wrong message. We need more taxes, not fewer. Even with the economy near “full employment,” annual budget deficits total hundreds of billions of dollars, and under present policies, they will expand as more Americans retire and health-care costs grow. Although we can’t know the full consequences, they could be serious.”

Related:
Robert Samuelson on the ‘Captured Economy’
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/our-economic-cannibalism/2017/10/08/9a7de5a4-aab0-11e7-850e-2bdd1236be5d_story.html


China's Rising Influence

China and the West
China’s Creditor Imperialism
India vs. China

Monday, December 18, 2017

Jim Simons – Profile of a Quant Legend

A great read [highly recommended]: Jim Simons, the Numbers King
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/12/18/jim-simons-the-numbers-king

Why Economics as a Discipline Needs to be Less US-Centric

Economics as a discipline is almost entirely dominated by US-based universities (nearly all the top journals are based at leading American economics departments and most of the top international economists obtained their graduate education in the US). This creates a strange worldview – major policy debates are often entirely US-centric and ignore the fact that the rest of the world differs in significant ways from America and may in fact offer some useful lessons.
---
Imagine if the debate regarding taxes and the size of the government was approached from an international perspective. Can we actually learn something from looking at the experiences of the 96% of the world’s population that does not live in the United States?

Here are a few pieces that provide an international perspective on key issues:
Taxes Are Low in the U.S., But Other Stuff Is Expensive
Why Canada Is Able to Do Things Better
5 Reasons Germany Isn't Suffering in the 21st Century
America in the early part of 21st century

SIMPLIFYING THE TAX CODE

Saturday, December 16, 2017

Friday, December 15, 2017

Quality Differences and GDP Measurement

Bloomberg’s Noah Smith makes an interesting point:
“Many of the little quality differences  -- Japan has longer-lasting products, cleaner buildings and streets and food that’s healthier but still tastes great -- won’t show up in the relative GDP numbers. Economists can correct for relative price differences by measuring the disparate prices of non-tradable goods and services -- an adjustment known as purchasing power parity. But PPP will tend to miss a lot of these quality differences….
So while GDP is a good measure of the really big economic differences between rich and poor countries, it’s not very good for comparing the true economic well-being of different countries at similar levels of development. If you want to know whether Japan, the U.S., Germany, South Korea or some other rich country is truly wealthier, you can’t just look at the GDP numbers -- you also have to live there and see for yourself.”

Inequality and the Rising Stock Market

An illuminating read:

Sunday, December 3, 2017

The Time Inconsistency Problem

What is the time inconsistency problem?

Recent Examples:
Republicans grouse about tax models they once supported
Congress' deficit hawks seem to have gone missing in action
http://www.aei.org/publication/congress-deficit-hawks-seem-to-have-gone-missing-in-action/
Republicans are looking for proof their tax cuts will pay for themselves. They won’t find it.

Hyperinflation and Crypto-Currencies

Bizarre Development – Venezuela plans its own crypto-currency
Related:

Venezuelans struggle with the effects of hyperinflation
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-30/in-venezuela-the-dollar-s-gained-10-768-in-just-last-two-years

History of US Trade Policy


Related:
The Economist reviews Clashing over Commerce: A History of US Trade Policy by Douglas Irwin.
https://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21731616-douglas-irwin-agrees-trade-policy-important-all-manner-powers-are-wrongly

Saturday, December 2, 2017

Weekend Reading - 12/2

Drilling Reawakens Sleeping Faults in Texas, Leads to Earthquakes

What’s in New Zealand’s water?

Fractions: Where It All Goes Wrong

The Need for Vocational Training
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/12/do-employers-overestimate-the-value-of-a-college-degree/547343/

The US Is Exporting Obesity

Japan Wants Immigrants. The Feeling Isn't Mutual.

When Elites Get a Taste of Their Own Medicine

America – A Divided Nation

The Lines That Divide America by NITIN NOHRIA (Dean of Harvard Business School)

The Two Clashing Meanings of 'Free Speech' by Teresa M. Bejan (Associate Professor of Political Theory at Oxford)
“While trigger warnings, safe spaces, and no-platforming grab headlines, poll after poll suggests that a more subtle, shift in mores is afoot. To a generation convinced that hateful speech is itself a form of violence or “silencing,” pleading the First Amendment is to miss the point. Most of these students do not see themselves as standing against free speech at all. What they care about is the equal right to speech, and equal access to a public forum in which the historically marginalized and excluded can be heard and count equally with the privileged. This is a claim to isegoria, and once one recognizes it as such, much else becomes clear—including the contrasting appeal to parrhesia by their opponents, who sometimes seem determined to reduce “free speech” to a license to offend.”