Attention Economy


Friday, October 31, 2014

Cybernetics and Economic Planning

Fascinating piece in the New Yorker - The Planning Machine: Project Cybersyn and the origins of the Big Data nation:
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/10/13/planning-machine

BOJ Springs a Surprise


While the Fed may have ended QE3, Bank of Japan is nowhere near being done with its version of quantitative easing. Today, BOJ announced that it is taking asset purchase programs to a whole new level:
The BOJ will triple the pace of its buying of stock and property funds, extend the average maturity of its bondholding by three years to 10, and raise the ceiling of its annual Japanese government bond purchases by ¥30 trillion to ¥80 trillion. As a result, the BOJ’s target amount of annual asset purchases will rise to around ¥80 trillion ($730 billion) from the previous ¥60 trillion-¥70 trillion range. Mr. Kuroda also appears to have pushed back the two-year target for achieving 2% inflation effectively to three years, saying he sees prices rising to that level in the latter half of fiscal year 2015, which ends March 2016.”

Related,

Thursday, October 30, 2014

Is Keynesian Economics Back?

An interesting piece:
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-10-30/why-john-maynard-keyness-theories-can-fix-the-world-economy

Simple Math – China and Relative Economic Size


China’s population in 2013 was 1.357 billion while the U. S.'s was 316 million. That’s a ratio of 4.29 to 1.
Just to help the reader understand this size disparity, imagine that the U.S. was an average American man, weighing 191 pounds. If population were weight, then China would weigh the same as an 819-pound adult male grizzly bear.
Here is a fact: If every Chinese person of working age had a job for 40 hours a week, 50 weeks a year, those workers would only need to make $9.15 an hour for the Chinese economy to be larger than that of the U.S.”


See my previous post on a related topic:

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Goodbye to QE3

The Fed has decided to end its QE3 program:
“The Committee judges that there has been a substantial improvement in the outlook for the labor market since the inception of its current asset purchase program. Moreover, the Committee continues to see sufficient underlying strength in the broader economy to support ongoing progress toward maximum employment in a context of price stability. Accordingly, the Committee decided to conclude its asset purchase program this month”.

Regarding the future direction of short-term policy rates, the FOMC statement noted:
“The Committee anticipates, based on its current assessment, that it likely will be appropriate to maintain the 0 to 1/4 percent target range for the federal funds rate for a considerable time following the end of its asset purchase program this month, especially if projected inflation continues to run below the Committee's 2 percent longer-run goal, and provided that longer-term inflation expectations remain well anchored. However, if incoming information indicates faster progress toward the Committee's employment and inflation objectives than the Committee now expects, then increases in the target range for the federal funds rate are likely to occur sooner than currently anticipated. Conversely, if progress proves slower than expected, then increases in the target range are likely to occur later than currently anticipated.”

Law of Unintended Consequences and International Affairs

Extraordinary program (PBS Frontline) on the mess in the Middle East:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/rise-of-isis/

Monday, October 27, 2014

Technology and Obsolescence

An interesting piece in the New Yorker that highlights the rapid churn in the business world wrought by technology:
http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/duracell-age-iphone

Obsessing Over China's Short-Term Economic Fluctuations

Reports on China in the Western press these days suggests a certain level of ‘schadenfreude’ (pleasure derived from the misfortunes of others). 

An exception is the following piece by Bloomberg’s William Pesek 
For now, the best strategy for outsiders may be to look the other way, as best they can. Instead of obsessing over every tick up or down in China’s GDP growth rate, the investment world needs to give Chinese leaders time and space to implement the reforms they’ve pledged thus far.
Xi's challenge was clear last week when the global media convulsed over news China had grown the slowest in five years in the third quarter. Editors and bankers tripped over themselves to urge Beijing to do more to spur growth. This is what’s truly hypocritical: Even though everyone acknowledges that China must stop artificially pumping up its economy, markets panic at the slightest hint GDP is losing altitude -- as if China were some giant company that must constantly impress us.”

For those suspicious of China’s GDP figures, see research findings of economists at the Federal Reserve Bank at San Francisco:
On the Reliability of Chinese Output Figures by JOHN FERNALD, ISRAEL MALKIN, AND MARK SPIEGEL

Living Wages – US versus Europe

Complex issues associated with paying workers a living wage:

The NYTIMES piece notes:
“On a recent afternoon, Hampus Elofsson ended his 40-hour workweek at a Burger King and prepared for a movie and beer with friends. He had paid his rent and all his bills, stashed away some savings, yet still had money for nights out.
That is because he earns the equivalent of $20 an hour — the base wage for fast-food workers throughout Denmark and two and a half times what many fast-food workers earn in the United States
Many American economists and business groups say the comparison is deeply flawed because of fundamental differences between Denmark and the United States, including Denmark’s high living costs and taxes, a generous social safety net that includes universal health care and a collective bargaining system in which employer associations and unions work together. The fast-food restaurants here are also less profitable than their American counterparts”.

Dilma Gets Reelected in Brazil

Dilma Rousseff narrowly wins the Brazilian presidential race:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/102122398

The markets don't seem to be too pleased with the verdict.

Related,
India versus Brazil – Policymakers and Effective Economic Management

Saturday, October 25, 2014

Scientific Research and the General Public

What Scientists Really Do - An interesting piece in NY Review of Books by Priyamvada Natarajan, Professor in the Departments of Astronomy and Physics at Yale University. 
In the article, she notes:

“… In a word, the general public has trouble understanding the provisionality of science. Provisionality refers to the state of knowledge at a given time. Newton’s laws of gravity, which we all learn in school, were once thought to be complete and comprehensive. Now we know that while those laws offer an accurate understanding of how fast an apple falls from a tree or how friction helps us take a curve in the road, they are inadequate to describe the motion of subatomic particles or the flight of satellites in space. For these we needed Einstein’s new conceptions.”

Friday, October 24, 2014

Africa – Long-Term Growth Prospects


During the past decade, many countries on the African continent achieved impressive economic growth rates. Can they sustain it in the coming decades?
Noted development economist Dani Rodrik appears skeptical of an “African Growth Miracle”:

Interestingly, financial market participants are still aggressively seeking higher yields in Africa:

Monday, October 20, 2014