Attention Economy
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Sunday Reading - 2/24
Mexican Economic Prowess
South Korea – In Search of a New Growth Model
US Healthcare Debacle:
Time Magazine Cover Story on Exploding Cost of Medical Care
Fixes for High Healthcare Costs
Dalrymple on the British Empire
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Technology Unemployment
An interesting piece by Skidelsky:
He notes:
“In the early
nineteenth century, David Ricardo considered the possibility that machines
would replace labor; Karl Marx followed him. Around the same time, the Luddites
smashed the textile machinery that they saw as taking their jobs.
Then the fear of
machines died away. New jobs – at higher wages, in easier conditions, and for
more people – were soon created and readily found. But that does not mean that
the initial fear was wrong. On the contrary, it must be right in the very long
run: sooner or later, we will run out of jobs.”
Saturday, February 16, 2013
A Great Profile of Stanley Fischer
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/02/15/stan-fischer-saved-israels-economy-can-he-save-americas/
It is unlikely that Fischer will succeed Bernanke as the Fed chairman (Janet Yellen is the favorite). His contributions to the field of macroeconomics are, however, extraordinary.
It is unlikely that Fischer will succeed Bernanke as the Fed chairman (Janet Yellen is the favorite). His contributions to the field of macroeconomics are, however, extraordinary.
Friday, February 15, 2013
Debate Regarding Minimum Wage Laws
The Debate Regarding Minimum Wages
As ever, proposals to change the minimum wage law are generating
considerable debate. Here is a sampling of perspectives regarding the US
federal minimum wage law:
Pro
Opposed
Earlier piece related to the issue
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Interesting Items - Feb 13
David Brooks Makes Some Excellent Points Regarding the US
Economy
Another Example of the Ineffectiveness of Government
Subsidies
New Inventions Do Not Necessarily Improve Quality of Life
Shashi Tharoor eloquently articulates what some of us really
feel:
“Indeed, there is an
inverse relationship between the difficulty and expense of communication, on
one hand, and the quality of what is communicated, on the other. When telegraph
operators were paid by the word, and there was always the risk of garbled
transmissions, messages were crisp, succinct, and to the point. When neither
length nor complexity affects the cost of a message, however, the field is open
for irrelevant and unnecessary communication.”
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Sunday, February 10, 2013
Interesting Sunday Reading
A Thoughtful Piece from Greg Mankiw:
Economics of Happiness
Analyst Ratings, Momentum Trading and Market Efficiency
World’s Top Merchandise Goods Trader
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)