Attention Economy


Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Technology Unemployment



An interesting piece by Skidelsky:

He notes:
“In the early nineteenth century, David Ricardo considered the possibility that machines would replace labor; Karl Marx followed him. Around the same time, the Luddites smashed the textile machinery that they saw as taking their jobs.
Then the fear of machines died away. New jobs – at higher wages, in easier conditions, and for more people – were soon created and readily found. But that does not mean that the initial fear was wrong. On the contrary, it must be right in the very long run: sooner or later, we will run out of jobs.”

Saturday, February 16, 2013

A Great Profile of Stanley Fischer

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/02/15/stan-fischer-saved-israels-economy-can-he-save-americas/

It is unlikely that Fischer will succeed Bernanke as the Fed chairman (Janet Yellen is the favorite). His contributions to the field of macroeconomics are, however, extraordinary.

Friday, February 15, 2013

Debate Regarding Minimum Wage Laws


The Debate Regarding Minimum Wages

As ever, proposals to change the minimum wage law are generating considerable debate. Here is a sampling of perspectives regarding the US federal minimum wage law:

Pro

Opposed


Earlier piece related to the issue

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Interesting Items - Feb 13


David Brooks Makes Some Excellent Points Regarding the US Economy


Another Example of the Ineffectiveness of Government Subsidies



New Inventions Do Not Necessarily Improve Quality of Life

Shashi Tharoor eloquently articulates what some of us really feel:

“Indeed, there is an inverse relationship between the difficulty and expense of communication, on one hand, and the quality of what is communicated, on the other. When telegraph operators were paid by the word, and there was always the risk of garbled transmissions, messages were crisp, succinct, and to the point. When neither length nor complexity affects the cost of a message, however, the field is open for irrelevant and unnecessary communication.”